A healthcare app used for documenting a personalised

medicine journey.

Autolomous

Overview

Autolomous is a biotech platform digitising the production of personalised medicine. I joined as the first UX/UI designer to transform an early MVP into a scalable, user-first product suite. Collaborating with stakeholders and scientists, I helped secure NHS funding and expand the platform globally.

£2M

NHS Funding Secured,

design lead to investment.

5>30

Team growth, helped scale the business rapidly.


4 products

from 1 product to launching 4 products.


Global

first launched in UK, scaled to 18 countries.


Product team

CEO/CTO/COO

sales team

physicians

physicians

UX/UI team

CEO/CTO/COO

sales team

physicians

Team structure

I joined Autolomous as the first in-house UX/UI designer, taking over from an external agency that created the MVP. As the product scaled and user feedback revealed key issues, I was brought in to lead a full redesign and rebrand — focused on improving usability, brand retention, and overall user experience. Below is the updated team structure after I joined.

“We are struggling with utilisation, despite efforts users still preferred paper and pen. A redesign of the app was necessary”

Problem statement

A Previous look

Feefo feedback over the last 2 years uncovered current pain points users face. The top 4 informed areas that needed the most attention and outlined areas to investigate further.

Screen Phsyician sees when they log in for work

This serves as a dashboard, showing all personised treatment task flows, how far along they are and which one needs most attention.

Inside of a personalised medicine taskflow

As the medicine is produced a physician will check off each task as they complete a task.

Solution: Minimise size, add more value to user.

Description: Nav is large, and not useful

Solution:Use colour to indicate issues/status

Description: Icons are hard to learn

Solution: Keep a fixed message at top to keep the purpose clear.

Description: Inconsistant fields, Box vs underline

Solution: Single menu with settings and personal items within.

Description: Icons and tabs are ambiguous and is not apparent.

Description: Search and filter unnecessarily large.

Description: Information heavy - has no hierachy, not clear where to look

Solution: New approach with progress bar with labels.

Description: Icons are forgetful

Description: Not clear what function does or means, hard to learn

Description: Button does not pass accessibility test. Primary should be furthest to right

Significant painpoints

Feefo feedback over the last 2 years uncovered current pain points users face. The top 4 informed areas that needed the most attention and outlined areas to investigate further.

In-house Qualified person - 53

Marcia Thomas

I have been working for **** for over 25 years, when I started all

was done on paper. We tried out a few digital platforms and

saw the benefits - now we want to go for the full package..

Bio

Access accurate data anytime, anywhere

Link deviations to external systems

View root cause at release points

Check training and equipment summaries

Quickly review contextual eBMR data

Confirm product compliance with ease

Spot value changes and OOS issues fast

🎯 Goals

Difficult to review deviations as I have to manually look through paper

documents

Can not easily trends in deviations when using paper

Security is a concern, do not like having data at risk

⚠️ Frustrations

Personas were created to would keep us grounded. With a niche demographic it was essential to note all aspects of the users personality in order to create a product that fits the requirements while being easy to use.

Persona

Ideation

During ideation, we focused on translating complex offline workflows into a digital-first experience that felt intuitive to lab and quality teams. Through workshops, whiteboarding sessions, and rapid sketching, we explored ways to surface critical data at the right moments, minimise user error, and support compliance. Concepts were prioritised based on feasibility, regulatory alignment, and user feedback gathered during early validation.

Final interface

The final prototype brought together all validated design decisions into a cohesive, user-centred interface. It was built to reflect real user flows, showcasing streamlined navigation, refined content hierarchy, and key features prioritised through stakeholder and user input. This clickable prototype was used to demonstrate functionality, gather final feedback, and guide development during handover.

Graphics have been introduced to make the app easy to gage. Reducing the need for heavy text.

When the user clicks In they see an overview of how the development is going. On the right they see a helpful checklist

Overview

A Redesign from the ground up was necessary, being from the ground up meant very heavy focus on the users and the desires they have. It was necessary to be strong communicator, to coordinate sessions, speak with stakeholders and give opposing evidence backed up by research. As a result an effective, aesthetic and usable product has sufficed, sure to keep users engaged while increasing retention.

A timeline of events is an alternative way of seeing development. Here they can see what was done and at at what time.

A timeline of events is an alternative way of seeing development. Here they can see what was done and at at what time.